Turn Up the Eagles, the Neighbors are Listening.
So Herbie Hancock's Joni Mitchell thing won Album of the Year last night, beating out other things that speak more to, well, this century, like Amy Winehouse/Mark Ronson and Kanye. Maura wasn't surprised, and neither was I, and we both instantly compared it to the Steely Dan/Eminem fiasco of 2001 (although the Jethro Tull/Metallica thing is just as appropriate).
I don't know if there are any hardcore Hancock/Joni Mitchell fans out there silently screaming REDEMPTION IS OURS, but I can attest to the fact that February 22, 2001 was a bit more than a turning point for me in terms of my own tastes and my connection with the broader, up-to-date wider world. I talked a bit about my fan-ography re: SD here, but had to cut out a ton of stuff that would have diverted too much. So lemme do a little bit of it here.
As I mentioned there, Steely Dan was my chaperone onto the Web, and I learned how to engage on message boards and subscribe to listservs with my seemingly endless trove of SD arcana as the entrance fee. This coincided with the band reforming for Two Against Nature, its first new album since Gaucho, and a summer tour that was going to come to Cincinnati. I was as fully immersed in that band as I'd ever been in anything--parsing lyrics, trying to make sense of guitar tabs, arguing over the meaning of "Almost Gothic"--and was super excited that they were actually going to release new material in my own lifetime, and then I learned for the first time that everyone pretty much hates Steely Dan.
Just about for the first time. I mean, I had plenty of friends who hated anything slickly produced, anything not called Pink Floyd or Led Zeppelin or the Clash from the 70s, anything...well you get the point. These people were easy to dismiss, of course, in the way that we dismiss anyone who disagrees with something for which we're passionate. Steely Dan's an easy band to hate, lumped in as they so often are with smooth California 70s stuff like the Eagles (to which they must have been not-so-slyly referencing in the lyric up top, from the revenge-fantasy "Everything You Did"). Of course, if you care to dig even a centimeter below the surface, there's so much to discover beneath the sparkling veneer: Brill-ish pop craftsmanship, fucked-up character sketches about junkies and pedophiles and crazy people, sad and nostalgic reveries about dissipated scenes and falls-from-grace, a genius grasp of pre/postwar American music genres (blues/cool jazz/disco/country/American Songbook stuff), hiring sessions guys basically to play impossible guitar solos, and so on and so on. Steely Dan is the reason I like Belle and Sebastian's The Life Pursuit better than any other album of theirs (because large parts of it remind me of Countdown to Ecstasy), why I love Nels Cline's addition to Wilco, why I like disco, why I don't much like real jazz, why I like XTC, and so on. And so on.
But that night, Steely Dan wasn't the weirdo/outsider band that I knew (I ignored their chart successes purposefully: it made them mine), but a couple of lame old dudes who represented the establishment, and dentist's office music, and the longstanding irrelevance of the Grammies in general. Here I was, 23 years old, face-to-face with my first true taste dilemma, trying hard to swallow a pretty large pill. In their day, Becker and Fagen had covered a lot of the same thematic/scatalogical ground as Eminem (hello), but in 2001 their chosen idiom was about as irrelevant as luau music. Two Against Nature wasn't a great album by any means, but it did have a song about a guy who fucks his younger cousin, another one about S&M and another about drugs. Up against Eminem, though, they might as well have been Pablo Cruise.
I felt extremely nervous: for the first time, I had to consider my place within the larger (much larger) context of my contemporaries and popular culture. I'd spent my taste-formative years more or less awash in bands that were now considered dinosaurs, and at that point I'd only heard one or two Eminem songs. I felt sort of isolated, and would get annoyed when people who knew me as the "Steely Dan guy" started referring to me as "the guy who thinks he's better than Eminem." I cut my ties with the anonymous, probably pony-tailed online SD contingents and set about catching up with what I'd (mostly) missed. Seven years later, I couldn't be more up-to-date now if I tried. And not just because of teh internets, but for a myriad of factors, including the sorts of social interactions I've chosen to preference, these sorts of distinction battles, this having to prove my tastes to haters, seem like they happen once a day, if not more.
I don't know if there are any hardcore Hancock/Joni Mitchell fans out there silently screaming REDEMPTION IS OURS, but I can attest to the fact that February 22, 2001 was a bit more than a turning point for me in terms of my own tastes and my connection with the broader, up-to-date wider world. I talked a bit about my fan-ography re: SD here, but had to cut out a ton of stuff that would have diverted too much. So lemme do a little bit of it here.
As I mentioned there, Steely Dan was my chaperone onto the Web, and I learned how to engage on message boards and subscribe to listservs with my seemingly endless trove of SD arcana as the entrance fee. This coincided with the band reforming for Two Against Nature, its first new album since Gaucho, and a summer tour that was going to come to Cincinnati. I was as fully immersed in that band as I'd ever been in anything--parsing lyrics, trying to make sense of guitar tabs, arguing over the meaning of "Almost Gothic"--and was super excited that they were actually going to release new material in my own lifetime, and then I learned for the first time that everyone pretty much hates Steely Dan.
Just about for the first time. I mean, I had plenty of friends who hated anything slickly produced, anything not called Pink Floyd or Led Zeppelin or the Clash from the 70s, anything...well you get the point. These people were easy to dismiss, of course, in the way that we dismiss anyone who disagrees with something for which we're passionate. Steely Dan's an easy band to hate, lumped in as they so often are with smooth California 70s stuff like the Eagles (to which they must have been not-so-slyly referencing in the lyric up top, from the revenge-fantasy "Everything You Did"). Of course, if you care to dig even a centimeter below the surface, there's so much to discover beneath the sparkling veneer: Brill-ish pop craftsmanship, fucked-up character sketches about junkies and pedophiles and crazy people, sad and nostalgic reveries about dissipated scenes and falls-from-grace, a genius grasp of pre/postwar American music genres (blues/cool jazz/disco/country/American Songbook stuff), hiring sessions guys basically to play impossible guitar solos, and so on and so on. Steely Dan is the reason I like Belle and Sebastian's The Life Pursuit better than any other album of theirs (because large parts of it remind me of Countdown to Ecstasy), why I love Nels Cline's addition to Wilco, why I like disco, why I don't much like real jazz, why I like XTC, and so on. And so on.
But that night, Steely Dan wasn't the weirdo/outsider band that I knew (I ignored their chart successes purposefully: it made them mine), but a couple of lame old dudes who represented the establishment, and dentist's office music, and the longstanding irrelevance of the Grammies in general. Here I was, 23 years old, face-to-face with my first true taste dilemma, trying hard to swallow a pretty large pill. In their day, Becker and Fagen had covered a lot of the same thematic/scatalogical ground as Eminem (hello), but in 2001 their chosen idiom was about as irrelevant as luau music. Two Against Nature wasn't a great album by any means, but it did have a song about a guy who fucks his younger cousin, another one about S&M and another about drugs. Up against Eminem, though, they might as well have been Pablo Cruise.
I felt extremely nervous: for the first time, I had to consider my place within the larger (much larger) context of my contemporaries and popular culture. I'd spent my taste-formative years more or less awash in bands that were now considered dinosaurs, and at that point I'd only heard one or two Eminem songs. I felt sort of isolated, and would get annoyed when people who knew me as the "Steely Dan guy" started referring to me as "the guy who thinks he's better than Eminem." I cut my ties with the anonymous, probably pony-tailed online SD contingents and set about catching up with what I'd (mostly) missed. Seven years later, I couldn't be more up-to-date now if I tried. And not just because of teh internets, but for a myriad of factors, including the sorts of social interactions I've chosen to preference, these sorts of distinction battles, this having to prove my tastes to haters, seem like they happen once a day, if not more.
